Saga V: The Restoration · Series II

The Design Covenant

What ethical attention design actually requires — specified, technically grounded, and commercially argued.

The Legal Architecture series documented what the law requires platforms to stop doing. This series documents what ethical design requires them to build instead. Chronological feeds. Opt-in notifications. Session awareness. Open protocols. And a specific, signable covenant that platforms willing to commit to these principles can adopt publicly.

← Saga V: The Restoration
8
Specific design commitments in the proposed covenant
0
Platforms currently using voluntary return rate as a primary design metric
$0
Minimum engineering cost to implement chronological-default feed ordering
The Series Argument
The Papers
DC-001 · ICS-2026-DC-001
The Principles of Ethical Attention Design
What Replacing Engagement Maximization as a Design Objective Actually Requires
The Design Vacuum
DC-002 · ICS-2026-DC-002
Chronological Feeds and Why They Matter
The Single Smallest Viable Design Change and the Evidence for Why Platforms Resist It
The Algorithmic Default
DC-003 · ICS-2026-DC-003
What Notification Architecture Could Be
Friction by Design — the Case for Opt-In, Batched, and Time-Bounded Notification Systems
The Notification Trap
DC-004 · ICS-2026-DC-004
The Open Protocol Future
Decentralized Attention Infrastructure and What It Would Change About the Incentive Architecture
The Protocol Lock-In
DC-005 · ICS-2026-DC-005
The Design Covenant
A Proposed Voluntary Standard for Platforms That Commit to Cognitive Sovereignty of Their Users
The Covenant Standard
Named Conditions
The Design Vacuum
DC-001 · The Principles
The Algorithmic Default
DC-002 · Chronological Feeds
The Notification Trap
DC-003 · Notification Architecture
The Protocol Lock-In
DC-004 · Open Protocol Future
The Covenant Standard
DC-005 · The Design Covenant
About This Series

The Legal Architecture series identified what the law must require platforms to stop doing. The Design Covenant series identifies what ethical design requires them to build instead.

The distinction matters. Regulation that prohibits harmful practices without specifying ethical alternatives leaves platform designers with no affirmative target. The Design Covenant series provides that target: eight specific, technically achievable, commercially arguable design principles derived directly from the mechanism research in Saga I.

Each paper addresses one discrete design domain — feed architecture, notification systems, open protocols, and the synthetic design standard. Together they constitute a design specification rather than a regulatory critique — the positive case for what attention-respecting technology looks like in practice.

The Design Covenant itself (DC-005) is a voluntary instrument. This is a feature, not a limitation: it is designed to be adopted by platforms before mandatory standards reach them, and designed to become the template for those mandatory standards when they do.