πŸ’Ž

Attention Resilience Scale

Materials Science β†’ Mohs Hardness Scale

Two interacting scales determine whether you'll be interrupted. Hardness vs Sharpness. It's physics, not willpower.

The Question This Framework Answers

What disrupts what, and why?

The Fundamental Rule

If Sharpness > Hardness β†’ Disruption

This isn't about willpower, discipline, or trying harder. It's math. If the stimulus is sharper than your attention is hard, you will be interrupted. The only question is whether you design for this or fight against physics.

The Two Interacting Scales

Like Mohs scale measures mineral hardness, these scales measure attention dynamics.

πŸ’Ž
Attention Hardness

Your resistance to interruption. How hard is your current attention state?

1FogDisrupted by anything
2DriftLoosely directed
3SkimSurface engagement
4AttendNormal work attention ← Average
5FocusConcentrated, effort to break
6LockIgnores minor interruptions
7GripOnly major stimuli penetrate
8FlowExternal world fades
9AbsorptionOnly emergencies reach
10SamadhiNothing penetrates
⚑
Stimulus Sharpness

The penetrating power of a stimulus. How sharp is what's trying to interrupt you?

1AmbientBackground hum
2PeripheralMovement in periphery
3PresentNearby conversation
4SalientPhone buzz, name called ← Natural
5IntrusiveNotification sound, hunger
6CompellingBreaking news, social validation ← Engineered
7UrgentPhone ring, child crying
8AlarmingSmoke alarm, scream
9OverwhelmingPain, panic attack
10TotalComplete system capture

⚠️ The Modern Problem

~4
Average Human Hardness
~6
Engineered Stimulus Sharpness
-2
The Gap

The math guarantees failure. When engineered stimuli are 2 points sharper than typical attention hardness, disruption isn't a matter of willpowerβ€”it's physics. You can't flex your way past this. You have to change the equation.

Engineered vs Natural Sharpness

Extraction technology doesn't create new stimuliβ€”it sharpens existing ones beyond natural levels.

Natural Stimulus Natural Sharpness Engineered Version Engineered Sharpness Delta
Friend waves at you 3 Social notification 6 +3
Interesting rumor 3 Clickbait headline 5-6 +2-3
Tribal information 4 Outrage content 7 +3
Potential reward 3 Variable reward schedule 6 +3
Novel information 3 Infinite scroll 5 +2

What Degrades Hardness

Your baseline hardness isn't fixedβ€”these factors reduce it.

Sleep Deprivation
-1 to -3
Cumulative effect
Decision Fatigue
-1 to -2
Depletes through day
Recent Disruption
-1
Attention residue
Chronic Phone Use
-1 to -2 baseline
Trained distractibility
Hunger/Discomfort
-1
Bodily needs compete
Emotional Distress
-1 to -3
Background processing

The Two Levers

You can change the equation from either side. Most people ignore the easier lever.

πŸ“ˆ Build Hardness
  • Meditation practice+1 to +2 baseline
  • Regular deep work+1 baseline
  • Sleep optimization+1 to +2
  • Single-tasking discipline+1
  • Distraction logging+0.5 (awareness)
πŸ“‰ Reduce Sharpness
  • Notifications off-6 (immediate)
  • Phone in other room-4 (out of sight)
  • App deletion-6 (permanent)
  • Grayscale mode-1 to -2
  • Scheduled check times-3 (batching)

Notice: Reducing sharpness is faster and more effective than building hardness.
Most people do neither. The rare ones do both.

πŸ§ͺ Quick Calibration Test

1
Put your phone face-down, on silent, visible on the table
2
Start focused work (reading, writing, thinking)
3
Note when you first feel the urge to check it
Results:
β€’ <2 min: Hardness ~2-3 (significant training needed)
β€’ 2-5 min: Hardness ~4 (average)
β€’ 5-15 min: Hardness ~5-6 (above average)
β€’ 15-30 min: Hardness ~7 (strong)
β€’ >30 min without urge: Hardness 8+ (exceptional)

Connections to Other Frameworks

HQ Ecosystem